Move points off the balance sheet and onto the top line
Unredeemed points are a contingent liability that compounds every quarter. Redirect redemption into vouchers with add-on spend and the same balance turns from exposure into a repeat-purchase trigger.
Points earn far faster than they burn — and the gap accrues
Across North America there is roughly $48 billion in outstanding loyalty-points liability, and the imbalance is structural: points earn far faster than they are redeemed. Every point issued and not burned sits on the balance sheet as a contingent obligation, so the liability line grows even when the program does nothing for growth. A points bank that only accumulates is a cost center by construction.
Points Mall voucher-redirect architecture
Instead of letting points settle as cash offsets that simply discount an order, redemption is routed through a Points Mall where points convert into promotional vouchers that carry an add-on spend requirement. Burning a point now opens the next transaction rather than shrinking the current one — so the liability is retired in the act of generating incremental revenue, and the earn:burn imbalance stops compounding.
How it works
The mechanics behind points liability → voucher.
Redemption redirects to vouchers, not cash-off
The Points Mall makes vouchers the primary redemption path. A member spends points to unlock a voucher rather than to knock dollars off the cart, which controls the effective liability drawdown while giving the member a tangible reward.
Add-on spend requirement on every voucher
Each voucher is structured to require additional purchase to activate, so redemption pulls a follow-on basket forward. Points are only retired against a new transaction — the drawdown is matched to revenue, not to a standalone discount.
Liability converts into a revenue event
Because burning a point triggers add-on spend, each redemption moves value from the liability line into booked revenue. The accrual that used to worry the CFO becomes the mechanic that starts the next purchase.
McDonald's inverted its points liability into revenue by routing redemption through a points mall into add-on vouchers, scaling the model to 200M+ members with member GMV rising from 5% to 85%.
Frequently asked
If we make points harder to cash out, won't members feel cheated?
Redemption doesn't get harder — it gets more rewarding. Members trade points for vouchers that feel like a gift rather than a few dollars off — the redemption redesign McDonald's used to scale its points-mall model to 200M+ members. The change is in what a point buys, not in whether members can burn it.
How does this actually reduce the liability on our balance sheet?
Two ways. Redemption is channeled into vouchers with an add-on spend requirement, so each burn is matched to incremental revenue rather than a pure cash offset — and higher, healthier redemption draws the accrued balance down through transactions that make money instead of leaving it to compound.
Is the McDonald's redemption result real or directional?
Real. McDonald's routed redemption through a points mall into add-on vouchers and scaled the model to 200M+ members, with member GMV rising from 5% to 85% — a measured outcome from the deployment, not a modeled projection.
More CFO solutions
Overview →See it on your own numbers
Book a walkthrough, or model the LTV:CAC upside with the ROI calculator.