SocialHub.AI
COO · Efficiency & Margin · LBS

Measure the store visits a campaign actually caused

Foot-traffic marketing usually can't tell whether a campaign changed behavior or just counted people who were already coming. A member-keyed visit event and a randomized holdout replace the guess with a measured lift.

The problem — Industry practice

Store-visit attribution is a guess

Store-visit attribution is usually inferred from aggregate footfall or self-reported scans — no member identity, no control group — so the lift a campaign 'drove' is a guess. Without a member-keyed visit event and a real baseline, foot-traffic marketing can't tell an operator whether a campaign changed behavior or just counted people who were coming anyway.

The SocialHub.AI approach

A deterministic visit event, measured against a holdout

A deterministic store visit — a QR check-in or in-store redeem by a known member — fires a member-keyed, deduplicated event. A randomized holdout then measures the incremental visits a campaign actually caused, rather than a before/after guess. Privacy is by construction: consent and GPC gated, only derived visit events stored, never raw coordinates.

How it works

The mechanics behind store & location (lbs).

1

Member-keyed, deduplicated visit events

A visit only registers when a known member takes a deterministic action in store — a QR check-in or an in-store redeem. The event is keyed to that member and deduplicated, so the signal is an identified visit, not an anonymous footfall estimate.

2

Randomized holdout for true incrementality

Eligible members are split into a treated group and a randomized control that receives no campaign. Incremental visits are computed as the difference between the two — lift is measured against a real baseline, never a before/after comparison or self-estimated footfall.

3

Privacy by construction

Measurement is consent-gated and honors Global Privacy Control signals; only derived visit events are stored, never raw location coordinates. The method is built to prove lift without building a location-tracking dataset.

Proof — SocialHub.AI — methodology

Methodology, not a claimed result: store-visit lift is computed against a randomized control from member-keyed check-in and redeem events — never a before/after guess or self-estimated footfall — with consent and GPC gates and only derived events stored. See the LBS module for how it's delivered.

Frequently asked

How is a store visit actually detected?

By a deterministic action from a known member — a QR check-in or an in-store redeem — which fires a member-keyed, deduplicated event. There is no ambient location tracking; a visit is an identified, opted-in action, not an inferred proximity ping.

How do you know a campaign caused the visit?

A randomized holdout. Eligible members are split into treated and control groups, and incremental visits are the measured difference between them — so the number reflects true lift, not people who were coming anyway.

What about privacy and location data?

Measurement is consent and GPC gated, and only derived visit events are stored — never raw coordinates. The design proves incremental visits without retaining a location-tracking dataset.

See it on your own numbers

Book a walkthrough, or model the LTV:CAC upside with the ROI calculator.